This photo, originally in the January '10 issue of Parenting magazine, nearly gave me a brain aneurysm when I first saw it.
So, so many things.
For starters:
-She is eleven years old.
-She is holding a doughnut and wincing at her weight on the scale.
-She weighs 129lbs.
-To get a full body shot like that, she must have a positively Louvre-like bathroom. Or the photographer is standing directly inside her full length mirror.
Am I to feel any sort of connection with this image? Any sympathy for her plight? I do not believe that she either a) feels badly about herself or b) eats doughnuts. Maybe even c) has kids. (LOOK at those HIPS! Eleven.)
And sure, I'm not compelled to immediately identify with every single picture placed in front of me- but come on. The magazine is called 'Parenting'. Not 'Awesome Thin People Eating Junk Food'. (Although- sign me up for that one.) But its target demographic is the young Mom and Dad. Who presumably, if they have body image issues at all, have legit ones. (If I looked that good and had a doughnut, you would surely not hear me complain.) The article goes on to extol the virtues of being easy on yourself after the holidays, that a new diet is sure to fail now and again. The important thing is to not beat yourself up! Have a doughnut!
At the time that this magazine entered our house, I was a hot mess of hormones, sleep deprivation, Chicago winter skin/body/hair, and forty extra pounds of taco. You think you've seen tears? You have not seen tears. And a frightened P.J. did not think that a bag of Mexican food could solve it this time.
Instead, he told me to hang on to the article. Maybe even hang it up in my office. Before I could projectile weep at him, he delicately suggested (from behind protective forearms) that I take my own picture when I felt good about myself. Compare the two. Laugh. Have a snack.
And ten months later, I did.
I made a few executive edits:
-Wasn't so much feelin' the underpants thing.
-My shirt is crazy cooler.
-Martinis make scales easier. (Also- we don't "keep" doughnuts around. You either walk in and have them in a box, or you've just run out of doughnuts.)
-I've definitely got more rage than consternation.
-My camera was propped up in my toddler's Snack Trap.
So, what's my point? Am I coming almost a year late to The January Issue Of Parenting Made Me Feel Badly party? Am I railing against unfair depictions of actual Momitude in the media? Do I believe that only hefty people should consume baked goods?
Nope.
Oh sure, I was all set to be a stoic example of what a Real Mother On A Scale Holding A Highly Caloric Object looks like- a super zoom would reveal my lack of makeup, poorly patched "pedicure" and yes, those are a series of small holes on the front of my favorite tee- indeed, I kept it REAL. Until I stepped on the scale.
For you see, I didn't weigh 129lbs. I weighed slightly less. (Take that, MODEL.)
Now I was in a wicked pickle. There is NO humor in being smaller than the teensy person whom you are in the act of condemning for the samesuch quality! NONE.
But there was a smallish bit of pride. Not just that I was [fleetingly] thin, but that my self-created diet of tears, once a month Pilates, stress, more tears, some yelling, okay- more yelling, forgetting to eat, more than making up for it and crying out the difference, and playlot shame WORKED! For the time being!
Sure, it was nearly inevitable that once I stopped eating for seven- loooong after I'd had the baby- that I'd shed most of the weight. But should I should call Parenting and have them feature me as January's obnoxious example of unattainable long-term lifestyle goals? No way. Here's why:
Because in my quest to mock an unfair depiction, I've unwittingly become closer to the actual image against which I'd raged, an act which demands that I- momentarily- dislike and scorn myself. I'm basically required to wonder about what it is, exactly, that I'm trying to "say" to Me in general...and then spend way too much time agonizing about how I'm presenting Me to Myself in the media. It's kinda like Time Cop. Also- the weight of Not Real Problems is staggeringly heavy and hubris adds about twenty pounds. Oop, there we go. Back to normal. Thanks for nothing Parenting.
But I'm not gonna beat myself up about it.
Doughnut, anyone?
22 comments:
I am always amazed at the magazine photos and how little the publishers care to stay true to their audience. Parenting magazine readers unite, boycott...maybe. But, certainly we need to start demanding an end to all of this self loathing. I have been battling my self image most of my life and I want the cycle to end for my daughter. I tell her every day how beautiful she is not only for her appearance but her presence. Check out this video of a model being prepped for a shoot and tell me where we are going wrong....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcFlxSlOKNI
I wondered why you were looking so sassy when I came home last night. Though the martini was missing...
"Keely Re-enacts a Stupid Picture" would make an excellent feature. It gets you up and moving and requires less reading from the rest of us.
I hate parenting and their stupid skinny models. they seem to say oh don't feel too badly about not fitting into your prepreggo jeans but whatever you do dont let it get out of hand! oh and you are pregnant? dear god whatever you do don't look like a whale or your husband will never want to mate with you again!
whatever happened to solidarity amongst women? sure i could hate you for having a just barely 1 yr old child and looking amazing, but i don't. ok maybe a little, but your amazingness doesn't take away from my less than skinny amazingness and frankly I like donuts way to much to give a crap!.
and i haven't met a man yet who is going to kick someone willing to knock boots with him out of bed for having a few extra pounds- especially after having their kid.
Mom o' Manassas- Can't open the link on my phone...shall later. And yes, I actually pondered if i needed MORE self loathing to put up a thing where i said i lost weight. Crazy, right.
P- You know it.
W- I'm gonna pretend it's 'cause it's a fun idea and not 'cause I'm long-winded.
R- Sing it. And the solidarity thing is true. I actually paused and wondered if I was gonna get hate mail for being stoked about my weight...for the first time in ten years!
You know, earth goddess images really need to make a comeback. How about martini's an curves? Wait! That's a magazine name if ever I heard one.
Martinis and Curves
Parenting for the 21st Century
Take that!
I would respond to your response but I didn't finish reading it.
I have never had thighs that thin, even when I was 118 lbs. And yes, yes I was that thin, many moons ago.
I want to see some guys in little briefs look that good, few of them do.
But in the end hooray for you Keel. Have a pink froster. Oh? You already did?
The weight issue aside, this model looks like she should be in an issue of Seventeen, not Parenting. I know there are a lot of young/young-looking moms out there, but the whole set up of this photo looks very juvenile to me.
Also, I totally support the "Keely Re-enacts a Stupid Picture" idea.
Is it bad that I want to punch that model in the face?
Probably.
PS: You're a really great writer.
PSS: Your legs are very cute.
PSSS: Approximately 78 seconds after I lost all of my pregnancy weight I got knocked up again...there was no time to hold a doughnut on a scale. Cruel irony.
Is it bad that I want to punch that model in the face?
Probably.
PS: You're a really great writer.
PSS: Your legs are very cute.
PSSS: Approximately 78 seconds after I lost all of my pregnancy weight I got knocked up again...there was no time to hold a doughnut on a scale. Cruel irony.
Hot momma!
I'm not sure I have anything insightful to say here (I think you covered those bases!) but this was super fun to read. And so, so relatable.
I always struggle a little (tiny) bit with my feelings re: "too perfect" photos in magazines. I like to think I'm firmly in the "No, show Real Imperfect People!" camp, but then! I'll see an ad for a local business or something where the person clearly *has* used a real person (probably the owner's granddaughter or something) and I totally find myself being hyper-critical. "You couldn't find a model without raging acne? You didn't think that kid's lazy eye would turn off your customers?" etc.
Because I'm a horrible person.
Anyway, I love the "Martinis and Curves" magazine suggestion that one of your other readers made!
While there are many things wrong with the picture, I would like to highlight that the size of her head in relation to the rest if her body is a key one. That noggin probably accounts for 50% of her 129 pounds.
This was too funny! While I'm not a mom yet, I can imagine myself feeling the exact same way. Heck, even now I'm looking at it thinking "SERIOUSLY?? How old is she?!"
Okay. I hope this doesn't come off as weird or anything, but...I think I love you. You had me at your picture.
I love this post! I read it while eating a doughnut ;)
that's hilarious!
i cant believe you kept the picture. I would have lost it by then.
First of all, loved the post.
Second, I HAD to comment because as I scrolled down, the bottom of the page with "Google Ads"...they were for anorexia and bulimia clinics. I find that hilarious. Way to go, google. Good fishing.
True, all true. Should I want that woman's life? Having to hold a doughnut in my hand to make the scale tip 129 in Photoshop????
Happy SITS day.
Dropping by from SITS.
LOVE your renactment of that photo! I WISH I weighed 129 pounds! I'm with other commentors on "Keely Renacts a Stupid Photo" suggestion...I think it would be fun!
"She's eleven," too funny & probably true :)
Happy SITS feature day!
Thanks for such a great post. It helped my morning turn back up the Happy Highway....because it was heading down the path of Dreading Another Day on the Diet!
Post a Comment